|
Conspiracy (2008)
IMDB rating: 4.90
Plot: A seasoned senior enlisted special operations (spec ops) United States Marine is wounded during combat operations in Iraq. He is retired from the Marine Corps and visits a friend on a ranch in the south west. When he arrives he discovers his friend has disappeared and no one will even admit to knowing of him.
|
Directors: Adams Marcus
Actors: Kilmer Val,Cole Gary,Jablonski Jay,Serano Greg,Gehrman Christopher,Rumnock Bob,Pena Steve,Atler Anthony Jordan,Briones Keanu,Burkett Scott,Cain Burly,Cantu Reynaldo,Forrest Tone,Drama,
harry potter conspiracy?
many say that harry potter 3 and 6 r the 2 best in the franchise.
and they r the only 2 which dont include voldermort
1,2,4,5 all had vodermort in them where u actually saw him
hmmm and iam prety dam sure we will be seeing vodermort in 7pt1 and 7pt2
????
Well, obviously the best films are going to include all of the characters which mean Voldemort has to be there. We better see Voldemort in 7 Part 1 and 2.
The Twilighter | Dec 29, 2009
.
Jed | Dec 29, 2009
No offence, but what exactly is your question?
richard | Dec 29, 2009
You mean, we’ll we like 7th part, where Voldemort is gonna be present all the time?
First of all, 3, 5, and 6 are GREAT!
And me, for example, in the forth movie like only that part with Voldemort! That movie had the worse acting by Radcliff and Emma T., They were sooo dramatic, especially her. So Voldemort saved the movie.
And they just couldn’t find better actor for Voldemort’s character!
So, yeah, it’s gonna be fantastic.
Can’t wait
Tamarundzaa | Dec 29, 2009
ahahahahahahahahaha!
From what POV were they talking?!
All decent films much mention the leading villain in some way
I was disappointed by both 3 and 6: 3 for its not following the book very closely at all – and it being the first book to truly break away from following the plot – and 6 missed out dumbledores burial and so the audience was left hanging. Both films left me going "wth?! where’s the rest of it"
Aforementioned and as with fairytales, it doesn’t bode well not to have a main figure of evil and a main figure of righteousness. We have plenty of the righteous cast, but the books include voldie being all evil and present and correct, even if it’s not for very long.
3 and 5 seemed to be books more as footfalls on a ladder for the rest of the structure of the tower of Harry potter to stand: for – in fairness – without those two books the series cannot really be followed.
My overall opinion: 3 – worst film for sticking to the plot, but great introduction to Sirius and Lupin and dementors.
5 – good for showing how tiwsted the magical world can become, even when evil itself hasn’t truly corrupted it. kind of portrays a picture of our world.
6 – good but losing dumbledores funeral was big F****ing mistake. Even in the first book’s opening chapters -and the frist film for that matter, the reader/audience is told how important it is that Dumbledore is around. "with Dumbledore around, Harry, you’re safe. With Dumbledore around, you can’t be touched" is what’s said. and then not to clearly tell the audience in the film that he is DEAD and BURIED and McGonagal is in charge – wth?! Sorry, this fact makes me very emotive. :/.
Moving on, the actual point you’ve raised about it being about film’s inclusion of voldie, that seems to be a snide remark predcominantly on Fienne’s acting. Personally, I think he does the job quite, considering his previous roles such as Chris Marshall in Maid in Manhattan; it’s a different route for his path to take, though I was duious at first to have an American in what I called a British cast and movie.
3 and 6 can’t be called the best movies: they’re introductions to the characters. I like 4 and 5 because we got to see more of Harry himself being pushed in different ways – both in magical ability and in a court of law. I liked seeing the past of Dumbledore too, and granted I also liked the mystery surrounding his sexuality and his own leniency with the Dark side, but still. That came across in both 5 and 6.
Book 7 is a very hard book to get your head around if one were to only scan read. But even on noyl scna reading, you couldn’t miss the lead villain, epseically in Harry’s death.
I’d like to know who these "many" people are – I’d like to read their argument!
Sorry for the long rant and ramble :/ by the way. But I’ve now said my peice and I’ll get down off my soap box. 
Hannah.
Hannah | Dec 29, 2009
i think that some people think that 3 and 6 are better bc there is no voldemort. the films can focus more on the budding friendships and romances in the films. however, i think that both parts of the seventh will bring everything to a whole new level. Face it, they are both pretty sad, so they won’t be as hap-happy as the others. But, you can still be it will be amazing!!!
Miley C | Dec 29, 2009
Dean Stafford